Annals of Intensive Care (Aug 2024)

Expert perspectives on ECCO2R for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: consensus of a 2022 European roundtable meeting

  • Alain Combes,
  • Georg Auzinger,
  • Luigi Camporota,
  • Gilles Capellier,
  • Guglielmo Consales,
  • Antonio Gomis Couto,
  • Wojciech Dabrowski,
  • Roger Davies,
  • Oktay Demirkiran,
  • Carolina Ferrer Gómez,
  • Jutta Franz,
  • Matthias Peter Hilty,
  • David Pestaña,
  • Nikoletta Rovina,
  • Redmond Tully,
  • Franco Turani,
  • Joerg Kurz,
  • Kai Harenski

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-024-01353-8
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 1
pp. 1 – 11

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background By controlling hypercapnia, respiratory acidosis, and associated consequences, extracorporeal CO2 removal (ECCO2R) has the potential to facilitate ultra-protective lung ventilation (UPLV) strategies and to decrease injury from mechanical ventilation. We convened a meeting of European intensivists and nephrologists and used a modified Delphi process to provide updated insights into the role of ECCO2R in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and to identify recommendations for a future randomized controlled trial. Results The group agreed that lung protective ventilation and UPLV should have distinct definitions, with UPLV primarily defined by a tidal volume (VT) of 4–6 mL/kg predicted body weight with a driving pressure (ΔP) ≤ 14–15 cmH2O. Fourteen (93%) participants agreed that ECCO2R would be needed in the majority of patients to implement UPLV. Furthermore, 10 participants (majority, 63%) would select patients with PaO2:FiO2 > 100 mmHg (> 13.3 kPa) and 14 (consensus, 88%) would select patients with a ventilatory ratio of > 2.5–3. A minimum CO2 removal rate of 80 mL/min delivered by continuous renal support machines was suggested (11/14 participants, 79%) for this objective, using a short, double-lumen catheter inserted into the right internal jugular vein as the preferred vascular access. Of the participants, 14/15 (93%, consensus) stated that a new randomized trial of ECCO2R is needed in patients with ARDS. A ΔP of ≥ 14–15 cmH2O was suggested by 12/14 participants (86%) as the primary inclusion criterion. Conclusions ECCO2R may facilitate UPLV with lower volume and pressures provided by the ventilator, while controlling respiratory acidosis. Since recent European Society of Intensive Care Medicine guidelines on ARDS recommended against the use of ECCO2R for the treatment of ARDS outside of randomized controlled trials, new trials of ECCO2R are urgently needed, with a ΔP of ≥ 14–15 cmH2O suggested as the primary inclusion criterion.

Keywords