BMC Urology (Aug 2023)

First experiences using transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA) as a promising focal approach to treat localized prostate cancer: a monocentric study

  • Inga Peters,
  • Bennet Hensen,
  • Julian Glandorf,
  • Marcel Gutberlet,
  • Martha Dohna,
  • Steffen Struckmann,
  • Markus Antonius Kuczyk,
  • Frank Wacker,
  • Susanne Hellms

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-023-01306-6
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 23, no. 1
pp. 1 – 9

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Purpose To share our experience using transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA) treatment for focal therapy of localized prostate cancer (PCa). Materials and methods Between 10/2019 and 06/2021 TULSA treatment for localized PCa was performed in 22 men (mean age: 67 ± 7 years, mean initial PSA: 6.8 ± 2.1 ng/ml, ISUP 1 in n = 6, ISUP 2 in n = 14 and 2 patients with recurrence after previous radiotherapy). Patients were selected by an interdisciplinary team, taking clinical parameters, histopathology from targeted or systematic biopsies, mpMRI and patients preferences into consideration. Patients were thoroughly informed about alternative treatment options and that TULSA is an individual treatment approach. High-intensity ultrasound was applied using an ablation device placed in the prostatic urethra. Heat-development within the prostatic tissue was monitored using MR-thermometry. Challenges during the ablation procedure and follow-up of oncologic and functional outcome of at least 12 months after TULSA treatment were documented. Results No major adverse events were documented. In the 12 month follow-up period, no significant changes of urinary continence, irritative/obstructive voiding symptoms, bowel irritation or hormonal symptoms were reported according to the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) score. Erectile function was significantly impaired 3–6 months (p < 0.01) and 9–12 months (p < 0.05) after TULSA. PSA values significantly decreased after therapy (2.1 ± 1.8 vs. 6.8 ± 2.1 ng/ml, p < 0.001). PCa recurrence rate was 23% (5/22 patients). Conclusion Establishment of TULSA in clinical routine was unproblematic, short-term outcome seems to be encouraging. The risk of erectile function impairment requires elaborate information of the patient.

Keywords