Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика (Aug 2008)

Stenting and cell technologies in the treatment of atherosclerotic renovascular hypertension Part 1. Effectiveness and safety of renal artery stenting in ischemic kidney disease

  • A. N. Kharlamov,
  • Ya. L. Gabinsky,
  • M. S. Freydlina,
  • E. K. Bos,
  • T. A. Naydanova,
  • S. D. Chernyshev,
  • B. V. Fadin

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 7, no. 4
pp. 83 – 88

Abstract

Read online

Aim. To assess renal artery stenting (RAS) effectiveness and safety in patients with renovascular hypertension (RVH) duration over 10 years.Material and methods. Seventy-eight patients were randomized into main (n=26) and placebo groups (n=52). Primary end-point was systolic blood pressure (SBP) level. Secondary end-points included: restenosis incidence; glomerular filtration rate (GFR); effective renal plasma flow (ERPF); creatinine level and microalbuminuria (MAU); quality of life (QoL); renal biopsy and immuno-hystochemical assay data; renal vessel calcification; cerebral metabolism level.Results. RAS resulted in average BP decrease from 181/107 to 142/93 mm Hg; after 6 weeks, no patient achieved target BP levels. Restenosis at 12 months was observed in 17% of the patients from both groups; another RAS was needed in 8%. According to dynamic nephroscintigraphy results, GFR reduced by 5% (p<0,05), and ERPF - by 3% (p<0,05). Creatinine level decreased by 3% (p<0,01), and MAU - by 7% (p<0,05). Assessed by SF-36 questionnaire, QoL was normal in 14- 29% only.Conclusion. RAS remains an ineffective method of RVH treatment, even though it prevents renal artery thrombosis and improves RVH control to some extent.

Keywords