Mood disorders influencing endometriosis and adenomyosis: Mendelian randomisation study
Panyu Chen,
Lei Jia,
Cong Fang,
Manchao Li
Affiliations
Panyu Chen
Department of Reproductive Medicine Center, Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center of Fertility Preservation, Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; and Biomedical Innovation Center, Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Lei Jia
Department of Reproductive Medicine Center, Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center of Fertility Preservation, Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; and Biomedical Innovation Center, Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Cong Fang
Department of Reproductive Medicine Center, Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center of Fertility Preservation, Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; and Biomedical Innovation Center, Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Department of Reproductive Medicine Center, Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center of Fertility Preservation, Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; and Biomedical Innovation Center, Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Background Many studies have found an association between mood-disorder-related traits and endometriosis and adenomyosis. However, the cause–effect relationship remains unclear. Aims We conducted Mendelian randomisation analyses to evaluate any causal relationship between mood disorders and endometriosis as well as different sites of endometriosis. Method Summary-level statistics for mood-disorder-related traits and endometriosis (8288 cases, 68 969 controls) in European populations were derived from large-scale data-sets of genome-wide association studies. A two-sample Mendelian randomisation was performed using the inverse-variance weighted and weight median methods. Further sensitivity analyses, including heterogeneity, pleiotropy and leave-one-out analyses, were conducted to test the consistency of the results. Results Genetically determined mood swings (odds ratio = 2.557, 95% CI: 1.192–5.483, P = 0.016) and major depression (odds ratio = 1.233, 95% CI: 1.019–1.493, P = 0.031) were causally associated with an increased risk of endometriosis. Mood swings (odds ratio = 4.238, 95% CI: 1.194–15.048, P = 0.025) and major depression (odds ratio = 1.512, 95% CI: 1.052–2.173, P = 0.025) were also causally associated with the risk of adenomyosis. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the reliability of the results. Conclusions Our results suggest that mood-disorder-related traits increase the risk of endometriosis and adenomyosis. This study provides new insights into the potential pathogenesis of endometriosis and adenomyosis, and highlights the importance of preventing endometriosis and adenomyosis in patients with mood-disorder-related traits.