BMC Endocrine Disorders (Mar 2024)

Expression and diagnostic value of lncRNA MALAT1 and NLRP3 in lower limb atherosclerosis in diabetes

  • Juan Li,
  • Chun Wang,
  • Chen Shao,
  • Jiaxin Xu

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-024-01557-w
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 24, no. 1
pp. 1 – 11

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Objective This study aimed to examine the diagnostic predictive value of long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1(MALAT1) and NOD-like receptor protein 3(NLRP3) expression in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM) and lower extremity atherosclerosis disease (LEAD). Methods A total of 162 T2DM patients were divided into T2DM with LEAD group (T2DM + LEAD group) and T2DM alone group (T2DM group). The lncRNA MALAT1 and NLRP3 expression levels were measured in peripheral blood, and their correlation was examined. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression model was used to screen for the best predictors of LEAD, and multivariate logistic regression was used to establish a predictive model and construct the nomogram. The effectiveness of the nomogram was assessed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, area under the curve (AUC), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results The levels of the lncRNA MALAT1 and NLRP3 in the T2DM + LEAD group were significantly greater than those in the T2DM group (P <0.001), and the level of the lncRNA MALAT1 was positively correlated with that of NLRP3 (r = 0.453, P<0.001). The results of the LASSO combined with the logistic regression analysis showed that age, smoking, systolic blood pressure (SBP), NLRP3, and MALAT1 were the influencing factors of T2DM with LEAD(P<0.05). ROC curve analysis comparison: The discriminatory ability of the model (AUC = 0.898), MALAT1 (AUC = 0.804), and NLRP3 (AUC = 0.794) was greater than that of the other indicators, and the predictive value of the model was the greatest. Calibration curve: The nomogram model was consistent in predicting the occurrence of LEAD in patients with T2DM (Cindex = 0.898). Decision curve: The net benefit rates obtained from using the predictive models for clinical intervention decision-making were greater than those obtained from using the individual factors within the model. Conclusion MALAT1 and NLRP3 expression increased significantly in T2DM patients with LEAD, while revealing the correlation between MALAT1 and NLRP3. The lncRNA MALAT1 was found as a potential biomarker for T2DM with LEAD.

Keywords