Addiction Science & Clinical Practice (Mar 2024)

Feasibility of precision smoking treatment in a low-income community setting: results of a pilot randomized controlled trial in The Southern Community Cohort Study

  • Scott S. Lee,
  • Nicole Senft Everson,
  • Maureen Sanderson,
  • Rebecca Selove,
  • William J. Blot,
  • Stephen King,
  • Karen Gilliam,
  • Suman Kundu,
  • Mark Steinwandel,
  • Sarah J. Sternlieb,
  • Qiuyin Cai,
  • Shaneda Warren Andersen,
  • Debra L. Friedman,
  • Erin Connors Kelly,
  • Mary Kay Fadden,
  • Matthew S. Freiberg,
  • Quinn S. Wells,
  • Juan Canedo,
  • Rachel F. Tyndale,
  • Robert P. Young,
  • Raewyn J. Hopkins,
  • Hilary A. Tindle

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-024-00441-1
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 19, no. 1
pp. 1 – 12

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background The feasibility of precision smoking treatment in socioeconomically disadvantaged communities has not been studied. Methods Participants in the Southern Community Cohort Study who smoked daily were invited to join a pilot randomized controlled trial of three smoking cessation interventions: guideline-based care (GBC), GBC plus nicotine metabolism-informed care (MIC), and GBC plus counseling guided by a polygenic risk score (PRS) for lung cancer. Feasibility was assessed by rates of study enrollment, engagement, and retention, targeting > 70% for each. Using logistic regression, we also assessed whether feasibility varied by age, sex, race, income, education, and attitudes toward precision smoking treatment. Results Of 92 eligible individuals (79.3% Black; 68.2% with household income < $15,000), 67 (72.8%; 95% CI 63.0–80.9%) enrolled and were randomized. Of these, 58 (86.6%; 95% CI 76.4–92.8%) engaged with the intervention, and of these engaged participants, 43 (74.1%; 95% CI 61.6–83.7%) were retained at 6-month follow-up. Conditional on enrollment, older age was associated with lower engagement (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.73–0.95, p = 0.008). Conditional on engagement, retention was significantly lower in the PRS arm than in the GBC arm (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.03–1.00, p = 0.050). No other selection effects were observed. Conclusions Genetically informed precision smoking cessation interventions are feasible in socioeconomically disadvantaged communities, exhibiting high enrollment, engagement, and retention irrespective of race, sex, income, education, or attitudes toward precision smoking treatment. Future smoking cessation interventions in this population should take steps to engage older people and to sustain participation in interventions that include genetic risk counseling. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov No. NCT03521141, Registered 27 April 2018, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03521141

Keywords