American Journal of Islam and Society (Jul 1992)

Commodity Exchange and Stock Exchange in an Islamic Economy

  • Muhammad S. Ebrahim

DOI
https://doi.org/10.35632/ajis.v9i2.2567
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9, no. 2

Abstract

Read online

I would like to take this opportunity to respond to Muhammad Akram Khan’s article “Commodity Exchange and Stock Exchange in an Islamic Economy,” which appeared in the American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences 5, no. 1 (September 1988): 91-114. The explanations advanced are from my personal understanding of Islamic and Western finance systems and are not a defense of Western financial markets. But I believe that the Islamic financial system should provide a better alternative. To begin with, I have no disagreement with Khan about interest-bearing instruments being haram. However, I do disagree with him in the following areas: Common Stocks (Mudarabah Certificates) As regards the physical possession of share certificates, the importance of such possession (a commodity) is given in the following hadith: “Ibn ‘Abbls reported Allah’s Messenger as saying: ‘He who buys foodgrain should not sell it until he has weighed it (and then taken possession of it)”’ (Siddiqui 1986, #3643). In the attached footnote (#1983), Siddiqui further states that: “Imh Shlfi‘i subscribes to the view of Ibn ‘Abbls that every salable thing, whether land, tree or grain, should be sold only by the buyer if he has taken possession of that. Imam Abu Hanifah is of the view that if it is a question of the sale of immovable property, the buyer can re-sell it before taking possession of it, the reason being that while destruction of the land is rare, that of the movable property is probable” (Ibid., vol. 3, p. 803). I interpret this to imply that as long as a person owns an indestructible thug and can give it to the buyer accordmg to a mutually acceptable agreement, it can be sold. In today’s environment, the actual physical possession of stock certificates is expensive and, in addition, they can be lost, stolen, destroyed, or otherwise damaged. Keeping such certificates with a broker is less expensive. Moreover, the physical transfer takes place on the settlement date, which is five days after the transaction date. In the meantime, if the new owner can get a better price before the settlement date, he/she should not be prohibited from selling the stock certificates. On the issue of speculation, one could curtail it by imposing a higher ...