Malaria Journal (Sep 2012)

Optimizing the HRP-2 <it>in vitro</it> malaria drug susceptibility assay using a reference clone to improve comparisons of <it>Plasmodium falciparum</it> field isolates

  • Rutvisuttinunt Wiriya,
  • Chaorattanakawee Suwanna,
  • Tyner Stuart D,
  • Teja-isavadharm Paktiya,
  • Se Youry,
  • Yingyuen Kritsanai,
  • Chaichana Panjaporn,
  • Bethell Delia,
  • Walsh Douglas S,
  • Lon Chanthap,
  • Fukuda Mark,
  • Socheat Duong,
  • Noedl Harald,
  • Schaecher Kurt,
  • Saunders David L

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-11-325
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 1
p. 325

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Apparent emerging artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Southeast Asia requires development of practical tools to monitor for resistant parasites. Although in vitro anti-malarial susceptibility tests are widely used, uncertainties remain regarding interpretation of P. falciparum field isolate values. Methods Performance parameters of the W2 P. falciparum clone (considered artemisinin “sensitive”) were evaluated as a reference for the HRP-2 immediate ex vivo assay. Variability in W2 IC50s was assessed, including intra- and inter-assay variability among and between technicians in multiple experiments, over five freeze-thaw cycles, over five months of continuous culture, and before and after transport of drug-coated plates to remote field sites. Nominal drug plate concentrations of artesunate (AS) and dihydroartemisinin (DHA) were verified by LC-MS analysis. Plasmodium falciparum field isolate IC50s for DHA from subjects in an artemisinin-resistant area in Cambodia were compared with W2 susceptibility. Results Plate drug concentrations and day-to-day technical assay performance among technicians were important sources of variability for W2 IC50s within and between assays. Freeze-thaw cycles, long-term continuous culture, and transport to and from remote sites had less influence. Despite variability in W2 susceptibility, the median IC50s for DHA for Cambodian field isolates were higher (p Conclusion The W2 reference clone improved the interpretability of field isolate susceptibility from the immediate ex vivo HRP-2 assay from areas of artemisinin resistance. Methods to increase the reproducibility of plate coating may improve overall assay interpretability and utility.

Keywords