Frontiers in Medicine (Nov 2024)

Distinguishing subclinical from clinical keratoconus by corneal measurements

  • Cristina Ariadna Nicula,
  • Cristina Ariadna Nicula,
  • Karin Ursula Horvath,
  • Karin Ursula Horvath,
  • Ariadna Patricia Nicula,
  • Adriana Elena Bulboacă,
  • Sorana D. Bolboacă,
  • Dorin Nicula

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1427666
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11

Abstract

Read online

PurposeThe study aimed to determine the stability of topographic and tomographic indices measured with Pentacam and to evaluate the biomechanical parameters measured with Corvis ST in the diagnosis of subclinical keratoconus (sKCN) and clinical keratoconus (KCN).MethodsThis is a single-center cohort study with a retrospective review of topographic and tomographic indices and biomechanical parameters on adult patients with subclinical keratoconus (sKCN), clinical keratoconus (KCN), and healthy subjects (control group). The area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) was used to identify the cutoff values for evaluated indices able to distinguish between subjects with sKCN and those with KCN.ResultsSeventy-six patients (76 eyes) in the sKCN group, 74 patients (132 eyes) in the KCN group, and 70 patients (140 eyes) in the control group were analyzed. Evaluated participants had similar age, but in the sKCN group, men were predominant (p = 0.0070). Significantly higher values in the KCN group of Front Kmax, ISV, IVA, KI, IHD, BAD_D, and lower values of TL and PRC (with excellent accuracy AUC > 0.9) were observed in the differentiation of KCN by controls. Similarly, excellent accuracies were obtained by Front Kmax, ISV, IVA, KI, IHD, KISA, I-S, BAD_D, and RMS-total with higher values in the KCN group and PRC and ARTmax with lower values in patients with KCN as compared to those with sKCN. Only Front Kmean (AUC = 0.946, Se = 85.6%, Sp = 90.4%, p < 0.0001) and I-S Pentacam (AUC = 0.96, Se = 84.1%, Sp = 97.3%, p < 0.0001) proved accurate and not shared with differentiation of sKCN or KCN by normal eyes. Front Kmean Pentacam proved good for case findings (0.806 [0.742 to 0.871]) and screening (0.712 [0.645 to 0.778]). I-S Pentacam performed excellent for case findings (0.826 [0.764 to 0.888]) and good for screening (0.758 [0.700 to 0.817]).ConclusionSubclinical and clinical KCN shared common Pentacam parameters with excellent or good accuracy in distinguishing subjects with and without pathology, but Front Kmean and I-S Pentacam proved excellent or good for case finding and screening and are not shared with differentiation of the sKCN or KCN by the normal eyes. Furthermore, differentiation of sKCN by normal eyes could be done with KISA (Pentacam) and CBI (Corvis) parameters, but only CBI is not shared with KCN.

Keywords