BMC Infectious Diseases (Nov 2018)

Association of TLR8 and TLR9 polymorphisms with tuberculosis in a Chinese Han population: a case-control study

  • Ming-Gui Wang,
  • Miao-Miao Zhang,
  • Yu Wang,
  • Shou-Quan Wu,
  • Meng Zhang,
  • Jian-Qing He

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-018-3485-y
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 18, no. 1
pp. 1 – 8

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Toll-like receptor (TLR) single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been associated with regulation of TLR expression and development of active tuberculosis (TB). The objectives of this study were to determine whether TLR8 and TLR9 SNPs were associated with the development of latent TB infection (LTBI) and the subsequent pulmonary TB (PTB) in a Chinese Han population. Methods Two independent samples were enrolled. The first sample contained 584 TB cases and 608 controls; the second sample included 204 healthy controls, 201 LTBI subjects and 209 bacteria-confirmed active PTB patients. Three SNPs (rs3764880, rs187084 and rs5743836) were genotyped. The associations between the SNPs and risk of LTBI or PTB were investigated using unconditional logistic regression analysis. Results The A-allele of TLR8 rs3764880 SNP was protective against the development of TB in males (A vs G, OR = 0.58, 95%CI = 0.37–0.91). The AA genotype of rs3764880 SNP was found to increase the risk of PTB among females with an OR of 4.81 (1.11–20.85). The G allele of TLR9 SNP rs187084 was found to increase the risk of PTB (G vs A, P = 0.01, OR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.10–2.00), the significance was also observed under dominant genetic models. The GA-genotype of TLR9 rs187084 SNP was found to increase the risk of PTB with an OR of 1.68 (1.07–2.65), but was found to decrease the risk of MTB infection with an OR = 0.64 (0.41–0.98). TLR9_rs5743836 SNP was excluded from the data analyses, because the minimum allele frequency was< 1%. Conclusions Our findings in two independent samples indicated that SNPs in TLR8 and TLR9 were associated with the development of TB, and highlight that SNPs may have different effects on disease pathogenesis and progression.

Keywords