A fuzzy TOPSIS-based approach for prioritizing low-impact development methods in high-density residential areas

Abstract

The study successfully implemented six low-impact development (LID) methods to manage surface runoff in urban areas: green roof, infiltration trench, bio retention cell, rain barrel, green roof combined with infiltration trench, and rain barrel combined with bio-retention cell. Each method has unique benefits in mitigating surface runoff effects in urban environments. The following four indicators were used to evaluate the methods: runoff volume reduction, peak runoff flow rate reduction, economic sustainability, and social sustainability. The study, which lasted approximately 4 months, was conducted in an eastern Tehran metropolis residential area with a mix of old and new buildings. The SWMM model determined runoff volume and peak flow values, and a price analysis list determined the economic index. Local experts completed 25 questionnaires to evaluate the social index. Fuzzy TOPSIS multi-indicator decision criteria were used to prioritize LID methods, and the Rain barrel + Bio retention cell combined scenario emerged as the best option based on all four criteria. The method reduced peak runoff flow by 23.1–66.1% under rainfall with 10-year return periods. The green roof + infiltration trench method had the highest percentage reduction of 2,737 m3, while the infiltration trench had the lowest reduction of 273 m3. HIGHLIGHTS Successful implementation of LID methods enhances urban runoff management.; Green roofs and rain barrels prove highly effective in diverse ways.; Four-month field study evaluates LID methods based on runoff indicators and sustainability.; Fuzzy TOPSIS analysis identifies Rain barrel + Bio retention cell as the best LID option.; Green roof + infiltration trench method demonstrates the highest peak runoff flow reduction (66.1%).;

Keywords

• decision-making
• hydraulic simulation
• lid
• stormwater collecting system
• urban water management