Evolutionary Psychology (Apr 2014)

A Life History Theory of Father Absence and Menarche: A Meta-Analysis

  • Gregory D. Webster,
  • Julia A. Graber,
  • Amanda N. Gesselman,
  • Benjamin S. Crosier,
  • Tatiana Orozco Schember

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491401200202
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12

Abstract

Read online

Is the absence of biological fathers related to their daughters' earlier age at menarche? Drawing on evolutionary psychology and life history theory, prior research has suggested such a relationship ( Belsky, Steinberg, and Draper, 1991 ; Draper and Harpending, 1982 ; Ellis, 2004 ). Although qualitative reviews have shown narrative support for this relationship ( Allison and Hyde, 2013 ; Ellis, 2004 ; Kim, Smith, and Palermiti, 1997 ; Susman and Dorn, 2009 ), no quantitative review exists to provide empirical support for this relationship or to explain mixed results. Thus, we conducted a random-effects meta-analysis of correlations ( Card, 2012 ) on father absence and daughter menarcheal age ( k = 33; N = 70,403). The weighted mean correlation was .14, 95% CI [.09, .19], suggesting that father absence was significantly related to earlier menarche; effect sizes were heterogeneous. Egger's regression ( Egger, Smith, Schneider, and Minder, 1997 ) showed no evidence of publication bias (file-drawer effect; r = .34, p = .052). Outcome measure differences (menarcheal age vs. menarcheal age embedded in a multi-item pubertal timing scale) did not moderate effect sizes. Study year effects ( Schooler, 2011 ) were also non-significant. Our findings support one aspect of the life history model and provide groundwork for subsequent examination of other pathways in the model.