BMJ Open (Aug 2024)

Diagnostic prediction models for bacterial meningitis in children with a suspected central nervous system infection: a systematic review and prospective validation study

  • Michael W T Tanck,
  • Matthijs C Brouwer,
  • Diederik van de Beek,
  • Merijn W Bijlsma,
  • Nina S Groeneveld,
  • Ingeborg E van Zeggeren,
  • Steven L Staal

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081172
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 8

Abstract

Read online

Objectives Diagnostic prediction models exist to assess the probability of bacterial meningitis (BM) in paediatric patients with suspected meningitis. To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of these models in a broad population of children suspected of a central nervous system (CNS) infection, we performed external validation.Methods We performed a systematic literature review in Medline to identify articles on the development, refinement or validation of a prediction model for BM, and validated these models in a prospective cohort of children aged 0–18 years old suspected of a CNS infection.Primary and secondary outcome measures We calculated sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and evaluated calibration of the models for diagnosis of BM.Results In total, 23 prediction models were validated in a cohort of 450 patients suspected of a CNS infection included between 2012 and 2015. In 75 patients (17%), the final diagnosis was a CNS infection including 30 with BM (7%). AUCs ranged from 0.69 to 0.94 (median 0.83, interquartile range [IQR] 0.79–0.87) overall, from 0.74 to 0.96 (median 0.89, IQR 0.82–0.92) in children aged ≥28 days and from 0.58 to 0.91 (median 0.79, IQR 0.75–0.82) in neonates.Conclusions Prediction models show good to excellent test characteristics for excluding BM in children and can be of help in the diagnostic workup of paediatric patients with a suspected CNS infection, but cannot replace a thorough history, physical examination and ancillary testing.