Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology (Jul 2024)

The value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing with different nucleic acid extracting methods of cell-free DNA or whole-cell DNA in the diagnosis of non-neutropenic pulmonary aspergillosis

  • Xiaomin Cai,
  • Xiaomin Cai,
  • Chao Sun,
  • Huanhuan Zhong,
  • Huanhuan Zhong,
  • Yuchen Cai,
  • Min Cao,
  • Li Wang,
  • Wenkui Sun,
  • Yujian Tao,
  • Guoer Ma,
  • Baoju Huang,
  • Shengmei Yan,
  • Jinjin Zhong,
  • Jiamei Wang,
  • Yajie Lu,
  • Yuanlin Guan,
  • Mengyue Song,
  • Yujie Wang,
  • Yuanyuan Li,
  • Xin Su,
  • Xin Su

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2024.1398190
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14

Abstract

Read online

PurposeMetagenomic next-generation sequencing(mNGS) is a novel molecular diagnostic technique. For nucleic acid extraction methods, both whole-cell DNA (wcDNA) and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) are widely applied with the sample of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). We aim to evaluate the clinical value of mNGS with cfDNA and mNGS with wcDNA for the detection of BALF pathogens in non-neutropenic pulmonary aspergillosis.MethodsmNGS with BALF-cfDNA, BALF-wcDNA and conventional microbiological tests (CMTs) were performed in suspected non-neutropenic pulmonary aspergillosis. The diagnostic value of different assays for pulmonary aspergillosis was compared.ResultsBALF-mNGS (cfDNA, wcDNA) outperformed CMTs in terms of microorganisms detection. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis indicated BALF-mNGS (cfDNA, wcDNA) was superior to culture and BALF-GM. Combination diagnosis of either positive for BALF-mNGS (cfDNA, wcDNA) or CMTs is more sensitive than CMTs alone in the diagnosis of pulmonary aspergillosis (BALF-cfDNA+CMTs/BALF-wcDNA+CMTs vs. CMTs: ROC analysis: 0.813 vs.0.66, P=0.0142/0.796 vs.0.66, P=0.0244; Sensitivity: 89.47% vs. 47.37%, P=0.008/84.21% vs. 47.37%, P=0.016). BALF-cfDNA showed a significantly greater reads per million (RPM) than BALF-wcDNA. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for RPM of Aspergillus detected by BALF-cfDNA, used to predict “True positive” pulmonary aspergillosis patients, was 0.779, with a cut-off value greater than 4.5.ConclusionWe propose that the incorporation of BALF-mNGS (cfDNA, wcDNA) with CMTs improves diagnostic precision in the identification of non-neutropenic pulmonary aspergillosis when compared to CMTs alone. BALF-cfDNA outperforms BALF-wcDNA in clinical value.

Keywords