BMC Cancer (Nov 2020)

Efficacy of EUS-guided FNB using a Franseen needle for tissue acquisition and microsatellite instability evaluation in unresectable pancreatic lesions

  • Mitsuru Sugimoto,
  • Hiroki Irie,
  • Tadayuki Takagi,
  • Rei Suzuki,
  • Naoki Konno,
  • Hiroyuki Asama,
  • Yuki Sato,
  • Jun Nakamura,
  • Mika Takasumi,
  • Minami Hashimoto,
  • Tsunetaka Kato,
  • Ryoichiro Kobashi,
  • Yasuyuki Kobayashi,
  • Yuko Hashimoto,
  • Takuto Hikichi,
  • Hiromasa Ohira

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07588-5
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 20, no. 1
pp. 1 – 7

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background The efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade in the treatment of microsatellite instability (MSI)-high tumors was recently reported. Therefore, the acquisition of histological specimens is desired in cases of unresectable solid pancreatic lesions (UR SPLs). This study investigated the efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) using a Franseen needle for UR SPL tissue acquisition and MSI evaluation. Methods A total of 195 SPL patients who underwent EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) or EUS-FNB (EUS-FNAB) between January 2017 and March 2020 were enrolled in this study. Among them, 89 SPL patients (FNB: 28, FNA: 61) underwent EUS-FNAB using a 22-G needle (UR SPLs: 58, FNB: 22, FNA: 36) (UR SPLs after starting MSI evaluation: 23, FNB: 9, FNA: 14). Results The puncture number was significantly lower with FNB than with FNA (median (range): 3 (2–5) vs 4 (1–8), P < 0.01, UR SPLs: 3 (2–5) vs 4 (1–8), P = 0.036). Histological specimen acquisition was more commonly achieved with FNB than with FNA (92.9% (26/28) vs 68.9% (42/61), P = 0.015, UR SPLs: 100% (22/22) vs 72.2% (26/36), P < 0.01). The histological specimen required for MSI evaluation was acquired more often with FNB than with FNA (88.9% (8/9) vs 35.7% (5/14), P = 0.03). Conclusions EUS-FNB using a Franseen needle is efficient for histological specimen acquisition and sampling the required amount of specimen for MSI evaluation in UR SPL patients.

Keywords