PLoS ONE (Jan 2021)

Open-source RNA extraction and RT-qPCR methods for SARS-CoV-2 detection.

  • Thomas G W Graham,
  • Claire Dugast-Darzacq,
  • Gina M Dailey,
  • Xammy H Nguyenla,
  • Erik Van Dis,
  • Meagan N Esbin,
  • Abrar Abidi,
  • Sarah A Stanley,
  • Xavier Darzacq,
  • Robert Tjian

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246647
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 2
p. e0246647

Abstract

Read online

Re-opening of communities in the midst of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has ignited new waves of infections in many places around the world. Mitigating the risk of reopening will require widespread SARS-CoV-2 testing, which would be greatly facilitated by simple, rapid, and inexpensive testing methods. This study evaluates several protocols for RNA extraction and RT-qPCR that are simpler and less expensive than prevailing methods. First, isopropanol precipitation is shown to provide an effective means of RNA extraction from nasopharyngeal (NP) swab samples. Second, direct addition of NP swab samples to RT-qPCRs is evaluated without an RNA extraction step. A simple, inexpensive swab collection solution suitable for direct addition is validated using contrived swab samples. Third, an open-source master mix for RT-qPCR is described that permits detection of viral RNA in NP swab samples with a limit of detection of approximately 50 RNA copies per reaction. Quantification cycle (Cq) values for purified RNA from 30 known positive clinical samples showed a strong correlation (r2 = 0.98) between this homemade master mix and commercial TaqPath master mix. Lastly, end-point fluorescence imaging is found to provide an accurate diagnostic readout without requiring a qPCR thermocycler. Adoption of these simple, open-source methods has the potential to reduce the time and expense of COVID-19 testing.