African Journal of Laboratory Medicine (Sep 2014)

Creating a sustainable culture of quality through the SLMTA programme in a district hospital laboratory in Kenya

  • Phidelis M. Maruti,
  • Ekesa A. Mulianga,
  • Lorna N. Wambani,
  • Melda N. Wafula,
  • Fidelis A. Mambo,
  • Shadrack M. Mutisya,
  • Eric N. Wakaria,
  • Erick M. Mbati,
  • Angela A. Amayo,
  • Jonathan M. Majani,
  • Bryan Nyary,
  • Kilian A. Songwe

DOI
https://doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v3i2.201
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 3, no. 2
pp. e1 – e5

Abstract

Read online

Background: Bungoma District Hospital Laboratory (BDHL), which supports a 200-bed referral facility, began its Strengthening Laboratory Management Toward Accreditation (SLMTA) journey in 2011 together with eight other laboratories in the second round of SLMTA rollout in Kenya. Objectives: To describe how the SLMTA programme and enhanced quality interventions changed the culture and management style at BDHL and instilled a quality system designed to sustain progress for years to come. Methods: SLMTA implementation followed the standard three-workshop series, mentorship site visits and audits. In order to build sustainability of progress, BDHL integrated quality improvement processes into its daily operations. The lab undertook a process of changing its internal culture to align all hospital stakeholders – including upper management, clinicians, laboratory staff and maintenance staff – to the mission of sustainable quality practices at BDHL. Results: After 16 months in the SLMTA programme, BDHL improved from zero stars (38%) to four stars (89%). Over a period of two to three years, external quality assessment results improved from 47% to 87%; staff punctuality increased from 49% to 82%; clinician complaints decreased from 83% to 16; rejection rates decreased from 12% to 3%; and annual equipment repairs decreased from 40 to 15. Twelve months later the laboratory scored three stars (81%) in an external surveillance audit conducted by Kenya Accreditation Service (KENAS). Conclusion: Management buy-in, staff participation, use of progress-monitoring tools and feedback systems, as well as incorporation of improvement processes into routine daily activities, were vital in developing and sustaining a culture of quality improvement.