Global Heart (Jun 2024)

The Prevalence and Epidemiological Features of Ischaemic Heart Disease in Sri Lanka

  • Nilmini Wijemunige,
  • Ravindra P. Rannan-Eliya,
  • H. M. M. Herath,
  • Owen O’Donnell

DOI
https://doi.org/10.5334/gh.1330
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 19, no. 1
pp. 49 – 49

Abstract

Read online

Background: There is limited evidence on the prevalence of ischaemic heart disease (IHD) and its association with risk factors and socioeconomic status (SES) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Given the relatively high levels of access to healthcare in Sri Lanka, the association of IHD with SES may be different from that observed in other LMICs. Objectives: To estimate the prevalence of IHD in Sri Lanka, determine its associated risk factors and its association with SES. Methods: We analysed data from 6,513 adults aged ≥18 years examined in the 2018/19 Sri Lanka Health and Ageing Study. We used the Rose angina questionnaire to classify participants as having angina (Angina+) and used self-report or medical records to identify participants with a history of IHD (History+). The association of Angina+ and History+ with age, ethnicity, sector of residence, education level, household SES wealth quintile, area SES wealth quintile, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, total cholesterol, cholesterol-to-HDL ratio, waist-to-hip ratio and body mass index were analysed in unadjusted and adjusted models. Additional analyses were performed to investigate sensitivity to correction for missing data and to benchmark estimates against evidence from other studies. Conclusions: We estimated prevalence of History+ of 3.9% (95% CI 3.3%–4.4%) and Angina+ of 3.0% (95% CI 2.4%–3.5%) in adults aged 18 years and over. The prevalence of Angina+ was higher in women than men (3.9% vs. 1.9%, p < 0.001) whilst prevalence of History+ was lower (3.8% vs. 4.0%, p = 0.8), which may suggest a higher rate of undiagnosed IHD in women. A history of IHD was strongly associated with age, hypertension and diabetes status even after adjusting for sociodemographic factors. Though the prevalence of History+ was higher in the most developed area SES tertile and urban areas, History+ was also associated with less education but not household SES, consistent with patterns emerging from other LMICs.

Keywords