Renal Failure (Jan 2019)
Validation of the full-age spectrum equation in the approximation of glomerular filtration rate in Chinese patients with chronic kidney disease
Abstract
Introduction: To investigate the validity of the full age spectrum (FAS) equation in determining the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in Chinese patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and to compare the performance of FAS equation and the technetium-99m-diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid (Tc-99m-DTPA) renal dynamic imaging method. Methods: The GFR was determined by three methods in the same day: (a) Tc-99m-DTPA dual plasma sample clearance method (mGFR); (b) FAS equation (eGFR1); (c) Tc-99m-DTPA renal dynamic imaging method (eGFR2). The mGFR was used as the reference standard. The Bland–Altman method, concordance correlation coefficient and regression equation were applied to evaluate the validity of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). The bias, precision and accuracy were analyzed to compare the performances of eGFR1 and eGFR2. Results: A total of 162 subjects were enrolled in this study. The eGFR1 was correlated well with mGFR (concordance correlation coefficient was 0.896, p < 0.0001) and the regression equation was mGFR = –0.374 + 1.029eGFR1 (p < 0001). The Bland–Altman analysis proved good agreement between the eGFR1 and mGFR. In comparison with eGFR2, the eGFR1 showed better performance on bias (–1.22 vs. 8.92, p < 0001), precision (15.69 vs. 18.36, p = 0.047) and 30% accuracy (75.31% vs. 59.26%, p = 0.0009) in all participants. Conclusions: The FAS equation is valid in determining the glomerular filtration rate in Chinese patients with chronic kidney disease. The Tc-99m-DTPA renal dynamic imaging method is less accurate than the FAS equation and cannot be employed as the reference method in assessing the performance of FAS equation.
Keywords