Efficacy of front‐line immunochemotherapy for transplant‐ineligible mantle cell lymphoma: A network meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abstract

Abstract Background There is no standard first‐line immunochemotherapy regimen for transplant‐ineligible patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) currently, and the efficacy of various treatment remains unclear. Methods We conducted a Bayesian network meta‐analysis (NMA) of all eligible randomized controlled trials. Pairwise comparisons and ranking of different first‐line treatment options were performed. Results Nine studies were included in the NMA, involving a total of 2897 MCL patients. The BR‐Ibrutinib+R regimen showed the best progression‐free survival (PFS), with a surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) of 0.89 and probability of being the best treatment (PbBT) of 69%. The VR‐CAP regimen was the most potential intervention to improve overall survival (OS), with a SUCRA of 0.89 and PbBT of 63%. Compared with the R‐CHOP regimen, the BR regimen achieved a better PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.45 [95% credible interval 0.2–0.96]). The BR‐Ibrutinib+R regimen (HR 0.14 [0.02–0.99]), BR+R regimen (HR 0.19 [0.034–0.99]), and BR regimen (HR 0.3 [0.08–1.03]) were superior to CHOP regimen with better PFS. The R‐FC regimen (HR 2.27 [1.01–5.21]) or FC regimen (HR 3.17 [1.15–8.71]) was inferior to the VR‐CAP regimen with a worse OS. Conclusions Our study presents the most promising first‐line treatment strategy for transplant‐ineligible MCL patients in terms of PFS and OS, which provides innovative treatment strategy for MCL treatment.

Keywords

• immunochemotherapy
• mantle cell lymphoma
• network meta‐analysis
• OS
• PFS