Is allostery a fuzzy concept?

Abstract

Allostery is an important property of biological macromolecules which regulates diverse biological functions such as catalysis, signal transduction, transport, and molecular recognition. However, the concept was expressed using two different definitions by J. Monod and, over time, more have been added by different authors, making it fuzzy. Here, we reviewed the different meanings of allostery in the current literature and found that it has been used to indicate that the function of a protein is regulated by heterotropic ligands, and/or that the binding of ligands and substrates presents homotropic positive or negative cooperativity, whatever the hypothesized or demonstrated reaction mechanism might be. Thus, proteins defined to be allosteric include not only those that obey the two‐state concerted model, but also those that obey different reaction mechanisms such as ligand‐induced fit, possibly coupled to sequential structure changes, and ligand‐linked dissociation‐association. Since each reaction mechanism requires its own mathematical description and is defined by it, there are many possible ‘allosteries’. This lack of clarity is made even fuzzier by the fact that the reaction mechanism is often assigned imprecisely and/or implicitly in the absence of the necessary experimental evidence. In this review, we examine a list of proteins that have been defined to be allosteric and attempt to assign a reaction mechanism to as many as possible.

Keywords

• allostery
• arginine repressor
• KNF model
• MWC model
• phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase
• uracil phosphoribosyltransferase