Deriving location-specific synthetic seasonal hyetographs using GPM records and comparing with SCS curves

Abstract

The hyetograph represents the temporal spread of rainfall intensity occurring at a point or over a watershed during a storm. The importance of regionally derived/developed hyetographs and the pooled sets of categorical seasonal curves on intensity-duration, intensity-depth, and depth-duration are of multifarious conveniences and importance. Twenty-one years of daily and sub-daily rainfall records (2000–2020) regained via satellite-observed precipitation products were examined and used to retrieve a valid understanding towards annual, monthly, daily, and hourly based variability of rainfall across six different stations. An attempt was made to compare the shapes of synthesized seasonal rain mass curves with that of the historic Soil Conservation Service (SCS) mass curve. The results indicate that the location-specific patterns and trends of curves do not align closely with any historical SCS curves or theoretical curves prevalent in the literature and commonly adopted. It has been observed that region-specific rainfall and its temporal distributions exhibit unique trends, not necessarily conforming to the standard SCS-based curves categorized as Types I, Ia, II, and III. This emphasizes the need to rely more on region-specific curves rather than instinctively adopting a standard set of curves. HIGHLIGHTS Region-specific hyetographs reveal distinct rainfall intensity patterns.; Historical Soil Conservation Service curve shapes do not align with regional trends.; Emphasizes the need for region-specific curves over standardized ones.; Advocates for site-specific mass curves and hyetographs.;

Keywords

• climate change
• hydrology
• hyetograph
• rainfall–runoff modelling
• scs curves