Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine (Sep 2023)

Focal and diffuse myocardial fibrosis both contribute to regional hypoperfusion assessed by post-processing quantitative-perfusion MRI techniques

  • Jeremy Weiner,
  • Corinna Heinisch,
  • Salome Oeri,
  • Tomasz Kujawski,
  • Zsolt Szucs-Farkas,
  • Zsolt Szucs-Farkas,
  • Rainer Zbinden,
  • Dominik P. Guensch,
  • Dominik P. Guensch,
  • Kady Fischer

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1260156
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10

Abstract

Read online

IntroductionIndications for stress-cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) to assess myocardial ischemia and viability are growing. First pass perfusion and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) have limited value in balanced ischemia and diffuse fibrosis. Quantitative perfusion (QP) to assess absolute pixelwise myocardial blood flow (MBF) and extracellular volume (ECV) as a measure of diffuse fibrosis can overcome these limitations. We investigated the use of post-processing techniques for quantifying both pixelwise MBF and diffuse fibrosis in patients with clinically indicated CMR stress exams. We then assessed if focal and diffuse myocardial fibrosis and other features quantified during the CMR exam explain individual MBF findings.MethodsThis prospective observational study enrolled 125 patients undergoing a clinically indicated stress-CMR scan. In addition to the clinical report, MBF during regadenoson-stress was quantified using a post-processing QP method and T1 maps were used to calculate ECV. Factors that were associated with poor MBF were investigated.ResultsOf the 109 patients included (66 ± 11 years, 32% female), global and regional perfusion was quantified by QP analysis in both the presence and absence of visual first pass perfusion deficits. Similarly, ECV analysis identified diffuse fibrosis in myocardium beyond segments with LGE. Multivariable analysis showed both LGE (β = −0.191, p = 0.001) and ECV (β = −0.011, p < 0.001) were independent predictors of reduced MBF. In patients without clinically defined first pass perfusion deficits, the microvascular risk-factors of age and wall thickness further contributed to poor MBF (p < 0.001).DiscussionQuantitative analysis of MBF and diffuse fibrosis detected regional tissue abnormalities not identified by traditional visual assessment. Multi-parametric quantitative analysis may refine the work-up of the etiology of myocardial ischemia in patients referred for clinical CMR stress testing in the future and provide a deeper insight into ischemic heart disease.

Keywords