PLoS ONE (Jan 2015)

Instability in the COPD diagnosis upon repeat testing vary with the definition of COPD.

  • Rogelio Perez-Padilla,
  • Fernando C Wehrmeister,
  • Maria Montes de Oca,
  • Maria Victorina Lopez,
  • Jose R Jardim,
  • Adriana Muino,
  • Gonzalo Valdivia,
  • Julio Pertuze,
  • Ana Maria B Menezes,
  • PLATINO group

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121832
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 3
p. e0121832

Abstract

Read online

A low FEV1/FVC from post-bronchodilator spirometry is required to diagnose COPD. Both the FEV1 and the FVC can vary over time; therefore, individuals can be given a diagnosis of mild COPD at one visit, but have normal spirometry during the next appointment, even without an intervention.We analyzed two population-based surveys of adults with spirometry carried out for the same individuals 5-9 years after their baseline examination. We determined the factors associated with a change in the spirometry interpretation from one exam to the next utilizing different criteria commonly used to diagnose COPD.The rate of an inconsistent diagnosis of mild COPD was 11.7% using FEV1/FVC <0.70, 5.9% using FEV1/FEV6 <the lower limit of the normal range, LLN and 4.1% using the GOLD stage 2-4 criterion. The most important factor associated with diagnostic inconsistency was the closeness of the ratio to the LLN during the first examination. Inconsistency decreased with a lower FEV1.Using FEV1/FEV6 <LLN or GOLD stage 2-4 as the criterion for airflow obstruction reduces inconsistencies in the diagnosis of mild COPD. Further improvement could be obtained by defining a borderline zone around the LLN (e.g. plus or minus 0.6 SD), or repeating the test in patients with borderline results.