Journal of Clinical Medicine (Aug 2020)

Anti-IL-6 Receptor Tocilizumab in Refractory Graves’ Orbitopathy: National Multicenter Observational Study of 48 Patients

  • Lara Sánchez-Bilbao,
  • David Martínez-López,
  • Marcelino Revenga,
  • Ángel López-Vázquez,
  • Elia Valls-Pascual,
  • Belén Atienza-Mateo,
  • Beatriz Valls-Espinosa,
  • Olga Maiz-Alonso,
  • Ana Blanco,
  • Ignacio Torre-Salaberri,
  • Verónica Rodríguez-Méndez,
  • Ángel García-Aparicio,
  • Raúl Veroz-González,
  • Vega Jovaní,
  • Diana Peiteado,
  • Margarita Sánchez-Orgaz,
  • Eva Tomero,
  • Francisco J. Toyos-Sáenz de Miera,
  • Valvanera Pinillos,
  • Elena Aurrecoechea,
  • Ángel Mora,
  • Arantxa Conesa,
  • Manuel Fernández-Prada,
  • Juan A. Troyano,
  • Vanesa Calvo-Río,
  • Rosalía Demetrio-Pablo,
  • Íñigo González-Mazón,
  • José L. Hernández,
  • Santos Castañeda,
  • Miguel Á. González-Gay,
  • Ricardo Blanco

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9092816
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9, no. 9
p. 2816

Abstract

Read online

Graves’ orbitopathy (GO) is the most common extrathyroidal manifestation of Graves’ disease (GD). Our aim was to assess the efficacy and safety of Tocilizumab (TCZ) in GO refractory to conventional therapy. This was an open-label multicenter study of glucocorticoid-resistant GO treated with TCZ. The main outcomes were the best-corrected visual acuity (BVCA), Clinical Activity Score (CAS) and intraocular pressure (IOP). These outcome variables were assessed at baseline, 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th month after TCZ therapy onset. The severity of GO was assessed according to the European Group on Graves’ Orbitopathy (EUGOGO). We studied 48 (38 women and 10 men) patients (95 eyes); mean age ± standard deviation 51 ± 11.8 years. Before TCZ and besides oral glucocorticoids, they had received IV methylprednisolone (n = 43), or selenium (n = 11). GO disease was moderate (n =29) or severe (n = 19) and dysthyroid optic neuropathy (DON) (n = 7). TCZ was used in monotherapy (n = 45) or combined (n = 3) at a dose of 8 mg/kg IV every four weeks (n = 43) or 162 mg/s.c. every week (n = 5). TCZ yielded a significant improvement in all of the main outcomes at the 1st month that was maintained at one year. Comparing the baseline with data at 1 year all of the variables improved; BCVA (0.78 ± 0.25 vs. 0.9 ± 0.16; p = 0.0001), CAS (4.64 ± 1.5 vs. 1.05 ± 1.27; p = 0.0001) and intraocular pressure (IOP) (19.05 ± 4.1 vs. 16.73 ± 3.4 mmHg; p = 0.007). After a mean follow-up of 16.1 ± 2.1 months, low disease activity (CAS ≤ 3), was achieved in 88 eyes (92.6%) and TCZ was withdrawn in 29 cases due to low disease activity (n = 25) or inefficacy (n = 4). No serious adverse events were observed. In conclusion, TCZ is a useful and safe therapeutic option in refractory GO treatment.

Keywords