Effect of contrast media on CT bone density assessment: comparative analysis of low-dose chest CT and abdominopelvic CT

Abstract

Abstract Detecting individuals with low bone mineral density (BMD) before clinical fractures occur may help improve the outcomes of osteoporosis and osteopenia. Although computed tomography (CT) is useful for opportunistic BMD measurement, the modality most suitable for opportunistic screening remains unclear. In this retrospective study, we compared the diagnostic performance of low-dose chest CT (LDCT) and contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic CT (APCT) for measuring BMD at L1 level using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) as a reference in individuals who underwent LDCT, APCT, and DEXA assessments on the same day. We included 512 individuals (median age: 60 years; interquartile range, 55−65 years; 307 men). Both LDCT (r = 0.706; P < 0.001) and APCT (r = 0.643; P < 0.001) exhibited strong correlation with DEXA T-scores. As T-scores decreased, the relative difference between LDCT and APCT Hounsfield unit values increased (b = − 6.456; P < 0.001). LDCT outperformed APCT in diagnosing both osteoporosis (AUC, 0.865 vs. 0.833; P = 0.035) and low BMD (AUC, 0.844 vs. 0.815; P = 0.006), which may be attributable to the greater effect of intravenous contrast media on CT scan characteristics in individuals with lower T-scores. These results may help inform the selection of imaging methods suitable for screening.

Keywords

• Bone mineral density
• Contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic computed tomography
• Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
• Low-dose chest computed tomography
• Osteoporosis
• Screening