Chinese Medical Journal (Jan 2015)

Effect of Final Kissing Balloon Dilatation after One-stent Technique at Left-main Bifurcation: A Single Center Data

  • Zhan Gao,
  • Bo Xu,
  • Yue-Jin Yang,
  • Shu-Bin Qiao,
  • Yong-Jian Wu,
  • Tao Chen,
  • Liang Xu,
  • Jin-Qing Yuan,
  • Jue Chen,
  • Xue-Wen Qin,
  • Min Yao,
  • Hai-Bo Liu,
  • Shi-Jie You,
  • Ye-Lin Zhao,
  • Hong-Bing Yan,
  • Ji-Lin Chen,
  • Run-Lin Gao

DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.152468
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 128, no. 6
pp. 733 – 739

Abstract

Read online

Background: Whether final kissing balloon (FKB) dilatation after one-stent implantation at left-main (LM) bifurcation site remains unclear. Therefore, this large sample and long-term follow-up study comparatively assessed the impact of FKB in patients with unprotected LM disease treated with one-stent strategy. Methods: Total 1528 consecutive patients underwent LM percutaneous coronary intervention in one center from January 2004 to December 2010 were enrolled; among them, 790 patients treated with one drug-eluting stent crossover LM to left anterior descending (LAD) with FKB (n = 230) or no FKB (n = 560) were comparatively analyzed. Primary outcome was the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events, defined as a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI) and target vessel revascularization (TVR). Results: Overall, The prevalence of true bifurcation lesions, which included Medina classification (1,1,1), (1,0,1), or (0,1,1), was similar between-groups (non-FKB: 37.0% vs. FKB: 39.6%, P = 0.49). At mean 4 years follow-up, rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (non-FKB: 10.0% vs. FKB: 7.8%, P = 0.33), death, MI and TVR were not significantly different between-groups. In multivariate propensity-matched regression analysis, FKB was not an independent predictor of adverse outcomes. Conclusions: For patients treated with one-stent crossover LM to LAD, clinical outcomes appear similar between FKB and non-FKB strategy.

Keywords