Medicina (Aug 2022)

Initial Data and a Clinical Diagnosis Transition for the Aiginition Longitudinal Biomarker Investigation of Neurodegeneration (ALBION) Study

  • Nikolaos Scarmeas,
  • Argyro Daskalaki,
  • Faidra Kalligerou,
  • Eva Ntanasi,
  • Eirini Mamalaki,
  • Antonios N. Gargalionis,
  • Kostas Patas,
  • Stylianos Chatzipanagiotou,
  • Mary Yannakoulia,
  • Vasilios C. Constantinides

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58091179
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 58, no. 9
p. 1179

Abstract

Read online

Background and Objectives: This article presents data from the ongoing Aiginition Longitudinal Biomarker Investigation of Neurodegeneration study (ALBION) regarding baseline clinical characterizations and CSF biomarker profiles, as well as preliminary longitudinal data on clinical progression. Materials and Methods: As of March 2022, 138 participants who either were cognitively normal (CN, n = 99) or had a diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI, n = 39) had been recruited at the specialist cognitive disorders outpatient clinic at Aiginition Hospital. Clinical characteristics at baseline were provided. These patients were followed annually to determine progression from CN to MCI or even dementia. CSF biomarker data (amyloid β1-42, phosphorylated tau at threonine 181, and total tau) collected using automated Elecsys® assays (Roche Diagnostics) were available for 74 patients. These patients were further sorted based on the AT(N) classification model, as determined by CSF Aβ42 (A), CSF pTau (T), and CSF tTau (N). Results: Of the 49 CN patients with CSF biomarker data, 21 (43%) were classified as exhibiting “Alzheimer’s pathologic change” (A+Τ– (Ν)−) and 6 (12%) as having “Alzheimer’s disease” (A+T–(N)+, A+T+(N)–, or A+T+(N)+). Of the 25 MCI patients, 8 (32%) displayed “Alzheimer’s pathologic change”, and 6 (24%) had “Alzheimer’s disease”. A total of 66 individuals had a mean follow-up of 2.1 years (SD = 0.9, min = 0.8, max = 3.9), and 15 of those individuals (22%) showed a clinical progression (defined as a worsening clinical classification, i.e., from CN to MCI or dementia or from MCI to dementia). Overall, participants with the “AD continuum” AT(N) biomarker profile (i.e., A+T–(N)–, A+T–(N)+, A+T+(N)–, and A+T+(N)+) were more likely to clinically progress (p = 0.04). Conclusions: A CSF “AD continuum” AT(N) biomarker profile is associated with an increased risk of future clinical decline in CN or MCI subjects.

Keywords