Influence of Field Sampling Methods on Measuring Volatile Organic Compounds in a Swine Facility Using SUMMA Canisters

Abstract

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) play a crucial role in emission control, being one of the most important sources of odor while also serving as significant precursors to secondary organic aerosols and ozone formation. Appropriate sampling methods are essential for accurately assessing the concentration and composition of VOCs within swine barns. In this study, the effects of both passive air sampling and active air sampling on VOCs were evaluated, and the influence of storage time on the VOC stability in sampling canisters for both methods was investigated. SUMMA canisters, which are electropolished and passivated with silanization, offer excellent corrosion protection and resistance to high pressure and temperature and were used in this study. The predominant component categories prevailing within the pig house were found to be oxygenated VOCs (OVOCs) and volatile sulfur compounds (VSCs), with ethanol emerging as the most abundant component of VOCs detected. Notably, the statistical analysis results revealed no significant differences between passive and active sampling regarding the impact of storage time on substance concentration. Changes in canister pressure also did not significantly affect substance stability. The results showed that the C2–C3 compounds remained relatively stable, especially within 3 days, with recoveries above 80% within 20 days. Methyl sulfide, dimethyl disulfide, and ethanol were more stable within the first week, but their recoveries significantly dropped by day 20, with methyl sulfide and dimethyl disulfide at 62.3% and 65.3%, respectively. This study contributes to the development of a foundation for selecting appropriate VOC sampling methods in swine facilities for conducting a rational analysis of VOC samples.

Keywords

• environmental pollution
• odor
• pig farm
• sampling methods
• volatile organic compounds