HGG Advances (Jul 2024)

Evaluating parental personal utility of pediatric genetic and genomic testing in a diverse, multilingual population

  • Priya N. Marathe,
  • Sabrina A. Suckiel,
  • Katherine E. Bonini,
  • Nicole R. Kelly,
  • Laura Scarimbolo,
  • Beverly J. Insel,
  • Jacqueline A. Odgis,
  • Monisha Sebastin,
  • Michelle A. Ramos,
  • Miranda Di Biase,
  • Katie M. Gallagher,
  • Kaitlyn Brown,
  • Jessica E. Rodriguez,
  • Nicole Yelton,
  • Karla Lopez Aguiñiga,
  • Michelle A. Rodriguez,
  • Estefany Maria,
  • Jessenia Lopez,
  • Randi E. Zinberg,
  • George A. Diaz,
  • John M. Greally,
  • Noura S. Abul-Husn,
  • Laurie J. Bauman,
  • Bruce D. Gelb,
  • Melissa P. Wasserstein,
  • Eimear E. Kenny,
  • Carol R. Horowitz

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 5, no. 3
p. 100321

Abstract

Read online

Summary: There is increasing evidence of the clinical utility of genetic and genomic testing (GT); however, factors influencing personal utility of GT, especially in diverse, multilingual populations, remain unclear. We explored these factors in a diverse cohort of parents/guardians (participants) whose children received clinical GT through the NYCKidSeq program. A total of 847 participants completed surveys at baseline, post-results disclosure, and 6 months (6m) post-results. The largest population groups were Hispanic/Latino(a) (48%), White/European American (24%), and Black/African American (16%). Personal utility was assessed using the Personal Utility (PrU) scale, adapted for pediatric populations and included on the surveys. Three PrU subscales were identified using factor analysis: practical, educational, and parental psychological utility. Overall personal utility summary score and the three subscales significantly decreased after receiving results and over time. Hispanic/Latino(a) participants identified greater overall personal utility than European American and African American participants at all time points (p < 0.001) as did participants whose children received positive/likely positive results compared with those with negative and uncertain results (post-results: p < 0.001 and p < 0.001; 6m post-results: p = 0.002 and p < 0.001, respectively). Post-results, higher subscale scores were associated with lower education levels (practical, parental psychological: p ≤ 0.02) and higher levels of trust in the healthcare system (practical, parental psychological: p ≤ 0.04). These findings help to understand the perspectives of diverse parents/guardians, which is critical to tailoring pre- and post-test counseling across a variety of populations and clinical settings.

Keywords