Parathyroidectomy for solitary parathyroid adenoma via trans‐areola single site endoscopic approach: Results of a case‐match study

Abstract

Abstract Background This study aimed to establish the standardized procedure of trans‐areola single site endoscopic parathyroidectomy (TASSEP), and to compare the performance of TASSEP with that of conventional open parathyroidectomy (COP). Methods This study enrolled 40 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) who underwent TASSEP, and included 40 of 176 PHPT patients who underwent COP based on propensity score matching. The retrospective analysis was conducted based on prospectively collected data. Perioperative outcomes, including surgical profile, surgical burden and cosmetic results and follow‐up were reported. The learning curve was described using a cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis. Results 40 TASSEPs were completed successfully without conversions or severe complications. There was no statistically significant difference in operation time between TASSEP and COP groups (80.83 ± 11.95 vs. 76.95 ± 7.30 min, p = 0.084). Experience of 17 cases was necessitated to reach the learning curve of TASSEP. Postoperative pain score and traumatic index (C‐reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate) in TASSEP were apparently lower than those in COP group (p < 0.05). During the proliferation and stabilization phases, TASSEP was associated with significantly better incision recovery and cosmetic scores. Postoperative serum calcium and PTH levels throughout the follow‐up period indicated satisfactory surgical qualities in both groups. Conclusion Based on precise preoperative localization and intraoperative planning facilitated by three‐dimensional (3D) virtual modeling, TASSEP can be feasibly performed on selected patients with satisfactory success rates and low complication rates, providing preferable cosmetic results and alleviating the surgical burden to a certain extent.

Keywords

• 3D virtual modeling
• endoscopic parathyroidectomy
• primary hyperparathyroidism
• single‐site approach