Hypertensive phenotypes and pattern of ambulatory blood pressure in patients of diabetes mellitus of kashmir valley

Abstract

Background: Patients of diabetes mellitus (DM) with hypertension (HTN) have a fourfold increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) as compared to normotensive nondiabetic controls. However, many patients of DM who are normotensive or have controlled blood pressure on office BP measurement (OBPM) may assume that they do not have increased risk of CVD but may be having HTN or uncontrolled blood pressure on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). Study Design Objective: A cross-sectional observational study to compare OBPM with ABPM and thus predict various hypertensive phenotypes like masked hypertension (MH) and white coat hypertension and pattern of blood pressure in diabetic patients of our population. Materials and Methods: Two hundred patients of DM with or without HTN were included in this study. The cases were subjected to detailed history, clinical examination, OBPM, and ABPM. Results: Out of 200 patients of DM, 32 were normotensives, 46 were hypertensives controlled on antihypertensive treatment, 22 were hypertensives not on anti-hypertensive treatment, and 100 were hypertensives uncontrolled on anti-hypertensive treatment. Among 32 normotensive diabetics, 17 (53%) patients had MH on ABPM. Out of these 32 normotensive patients, 7 (21.8%) had isolated nocturnal hypertension, 3 (9.3%) had isolated day-time HTN (IDH) and 7 (21.8%) had day-time and nocturnal HTN (DNH). Patients with MH had higher BMI, an observation that was statistically significant. Non-dipping pattern was found in 53% of patients of masked HTN. Out of 46 hypertensive diabetics with controlled OBPM on antihypertensive treatment, 26 (56.5%) had masked effect or masked uncontrolled hypertension on ABPM. Out of 22 diabetics with treatment naïve HTN, 7 (32%) were found to have white coat hypertension on ABPM. Fifteen (15%) patients out of 100 hypertensive diabetics with uncontrolled OBPM despite on anti-hypertensive were found to have white coat effect on ABPM. Patients with white coat effect had higher body mass index an observation that was statistically significant (p = 0.039). Non-dipping pattern was significantly associated with longer duration of diabetes (≥ 120 months), retinopathy and neuropathy. Conclusion: To rely exclusively on OBPM to diagnose HTN and monitor blood pressure may underestimate the CVD risk especially in diabetics. ABPM is a tool that may not only help clinicians in starting anti-HTN treatment perspicuously, but also may help in avoiding unnecessary anti-hypertensive treatment and/or withdrawing anti-hypertensive treatment as indicated and thus avoiding credulity.

Keywords

• ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
• hypertension
• masked effect
• masked hypertension
• office blood pressure monitoring
• white coat effect
• white coat hypertension