Radiation Oncology (Oct 2022)

Whether individualized dose escalation should be recommended for lymph nodes with different sizes in the definitive radiotherapy of cervical cancer?

  • Xiaojuan Lv,
  • Huiting Rao,
  • Tao Feng,
  • Chufan Wu,
  • Hanmei Lou

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-022-02132-0
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 17, no. 1
pp. 1 – 10

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background and purpose Dose escalation for positive node maybe improve the regional control of patients with node-positive cervical cancer, but the optimal dose for nodes of different sizes remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to explore the individualized dose escalation for lymph nodes (LNs) with different sizes in the definitive radiotherapy of cervical cancer. Methods A total of 1002 cervical cancer patients with the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO 2009) stage IB1–IVA, who were treated by definitively radiotherapy between September 2013 and December 2016 were enrolled. All LNs identified by computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI) were assigned into three groups according to the short diameters of 60 Gy) (control rate, 99.4% vs. 99.3% vs. 100%, P = 0.647) (5-year OS, 76.2% vs. 79% vs. 81.6%, P = 0.682) (5-year PFS, 74.1% vs. 73.9% vs. 78.9% P = 0.713). Among LNs of 1–2 cm, the control and PFS rates were significantly higher in the group of dose ≥ 55 Gy than the group of dose < 55 Gy (control rate, 98% vs. 93.6%, P = 0.028) (5-year PFS, 69.6% vs. 56.7%, P = 0.025). However, this did not cause a significant difference for 5-year OS rate (72.6% vs. 68.3%, P = 0.5). Among LNs ≥ 2 cm, the control, OS, and PFS rates were higher in the group of dose ≥ 55 Gy than the group of dose < 55 Gy, while no significant difference was found (control rate, 82.1% vs. 63.2%, P = 0.107) (5-year OS, 60.6% vs. 37.5%, P = 0.141) (5-year PFS, 51.5% vs.37.5%, P = 0.232). Conclusions Radiation dose escalation is not necessary for LNs < 1 cm, and dose escalation of 55 Gy is enough for LNs of 1–2 cm.

Keywords