Journal of Clinical Medicine (Jan 2023)

Dermoscopy of Actinic Keratosis: Is There a True Differentiation between Non-Pigmented and Pigmented Lesions?

  • Dimitrios Sgouros,
  • Melpomeni Theofili,
  • Theodora Zafeiropoulou,
  • Aimilios Lallas,
  • Zoe Apalla,
  • Alexios Zaras,
  • Konstantinos Liopyris,
  • Georgia Pappa,
  • Eleni Polychronaki,
  • Fiori Kousta,
  • Antonios Panagiotopoulos,
  • Alexander Stratigos,
  • Dimitrios Rigopoulos,
  • Alexander C. Katoulis

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12031063
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 3
p. 1063

Abstract

Read online

Dermoscopic features of actinic keratosis (AK) have been widely studied, but there is still little evidence for their diagnostic accuracy. Our study investigates whether established dermoscopic criteria are reliable predictors in differentiating non-pigmented actinic keratosis (NPAK) from pigmented actinic keratosis (PAK). For this purpose, dermoscopic images of 83 clinically diagnosed AK (45 NPAK, 38PAK) were examined, and the sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were assessed. Features with statistical significance were the red pseudo-network (p = 0.02) for NPAK and the pigmented pseudo-network (p p = 0.001). Pigmented pseudo-network (Se: 89%, Sp: 77%, PPV: 77%, NPV: 89%) with a pigment intensity value of more than 10% (Se: 90%, Sp: 86%, PPV: 79%, NPV: 93%) had excellent diagnostic accuracy for PAK. Scale and widened follicular openings with yellowish dots surrounded by white circles were equally represented in both variants of AK. Linear wavy vessels and shiny streaks were more prominently observed in NPAK, as were rosettes in PAK, but these results failed to meet statistical significance. The red starburst pattern was near statistical significance for PAK. Therefore, pigmentation is the strongest dermoscopic predictor for the differentiation between NPAK and PAK.

Keywords