PeerJ (Sep 2024)
Differences in cervical sagittal parameters and muscular function among subjects with different cervical spine alignments: a surface electromyography-based cross-sectional study
Abstract
Background We analyzed cervical sagittal parameters and muscular function in different cervical kyphosis types. Methods This cross-sectional study enrolled subjects with cervical spine lordosis (cervical curvature 4°), including C-, S-, and R-type kyphosis. We recorded patients’ general information (gender, age, body mass index), visual analog scale (VAS) scores, and the Neck Disability Index (NDI). Cervical sagittal parameters including C2–C7 Cobb angle (Cobb), T1 slope (T1S), C2–C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), spino-cranial angle (SCA), range of motion (ROM), and muscular function (flexion-relaxation ratio (FRR) and co-contraction ratio (CCR) of neck/shoulder muscles on surface electromyography). Differences in cervical sagittal parameters and muscular function in subjects with different cervical spine alignments, and correlations between VAS scores, NDI, cervical sagittal parameters, and muscular function indices were statistically analyzed. Results The FRR of the splenius capitis (SPL), upper trapezius (UTr), and sternocleidomastoid (SCM) were higher in subjects with cervical lordosis than in subjects with cervical kyphosis. FRRSPL was higher in subjects with C-type kyphosis than in subjects with R- and S-type kyphosis (P < 0.05), and was correlated with VAS scores, Cobb angle, T1S, and SVA. FRRUTr was correlated with NDI, SCA, T1S, and SVA. FRRSCM was correlated with VAS scores and Cobb angle. CCR was correlated with SCA and SVA. Conclusion Cervical sagittal parameters differed among different cervical kyphosis types. FRRs and CCRs were significantly worse in R-type kyphosis than other kyphosis types. Cervical muscular functions were correlated with cervical sagittal parameters and morphological alignment.
Keywords
