A near-optimum multi-objective optimization approach for structural design

Abstract

Multi-objective design optimization problems offer a set of solution alternatives within a Pareto-front. In structural design, the design variables are typically the section properties. The outcomes of these design variables are usually used in selecting standard sections. However, the properties of the selected standard sections normally have different values from the determined design variables. Accordingly, the values of the objective functions for these solutions will change after selecting standard sections. This change may be different among these solutions. Thus far, only Pareto-optimal solutions have been standardized in the literature. The effects of the inclusion of non-Pareto solutions in the standardization process have never been examined. In this paper, the differences between including the near-optimal solutions and not including them in the final structural design optimization set are explored. The paper investigates the impact of selecting standard sections on both Pareto-front solutions and near-optimal solutions, and it studies the importance of keeping track of the near-optimal solutions. A modified version of a multiple-objective particle swarm optimization method, enhanced with a proposed computationally efficient section standardization algorithm, is used to solve multi-objective system-reliability design optimization problems. The concepts of the paper are applied to examples of bridge structures. The results demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed technique in capturing final design solutions that would have been otherwise missed due to standardization.

Keywords

• Multiple Design Options (MDO)
• Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization (MDO-MOPSO)
• System reliability
• Structural design
• Bridges