Factors affecting signal quality in implantable cardiac monitors with long sensing vector

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Electrical artefacts are frequent in implantable cardiac monitors (ICMs). We analyzed the subcutaneous electrogram (sECG) provided by an ICM with a long sensing vector and factors potentially affecting its quality. Methods Consecutive ICM recipients underwent a follow‐up where demographics, body mass index (BMI), implant location, and surface ECG were collected. The sECG was then analyzed in terms of R‐wave amplitude and P‐wave visibility. Results A total of 84 patients (43% female, median age 68 [58‐76] years) were enrolled at 3 sites. ICMs were positioned with intermediate inclination (n = 44, 52%), parallel (n = 35, 43%), or perpendicular (n = 5, 6%) to the sternum. The median R‐wave amplitude was 1.10 (0.72‐1.48) mV with P waves readily visible in 69.2% (95% confidence interval, CI: 57.8%‐79.2%), partially visible in 23.1% [95% CI: 14.3%‐34.0%], and never visible in 7.7% [95% CI: 2.9%‐16.0%] of patients. Men had higher R‐wave amplitudes compared to women (1.40 [0.96‐1.80] mV vs 1.00 [0.60‐1.20] mV, P = .001), while obese people tended to have lower values (0.80 [0.62‐1.28] mV vs 1.10 [0.90‐1.50] mV, P = .074). The P‐wave visibility reached 86.2% [95% CI: 68.3%‐96.1%] in patients with high‐voltage P waves (≥0.2 mV) at surface ECG. The sECG quality was not affected by implant site. Conclusion In ordinary clinical practice, ICMs with long sensing vector provided median R‐wave amplitude above 1 mV and reliable P‐wave visibility of nearly 70%, regardless of the position of the device. Women and obese patients showed lower but still very good signal quality.

Keywords

• implantable cardiac monitor
• implantable loop recorder
• long sensing vector
• P‐wave visibility
• R‐wave amplitude