Una endeble cultura teórico-jurídica en la jurisprudencia sobre la «motivación» de los nombramientos discrecionales

Abstract

Two decisions of the the Third Chamber and their accompanyingindividual opinions will serve as an opportunity to rethink the advisability ofabandoning the doctrine, which currently prevails in that chamber, on the controlof the motivation of discretional appointments.

Keywords

• motivation
• essential comparison
• indifferent choices
• individual and joint assessment
• linguistic text and logic discourse
• regulated and discretional