Scientific Reports (Jun 2022)

Prehospital stroke notification and endovascular therapy for large vessel occlusion: a retrospective cohort study

  • Satoru Fujiwara,
  • Takehito Kuroda,
  • Yoshinori Matsuoka,
  • Nobuyuki Ohara,
  • Hirotoshi Imamura,
  • Yosuke Yamamoto,
  • Koichi Ariyoshi,
  • Nobuo Kohara,
  • Michi Kawamoto,
  • Nobuyuki Sakai

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14399-0
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 1
pp. 1 – 8

Abstract

Read online

Abstract The impact of prehospital notification by emergency medical services (EMS) on outcomes of endovascular therapy (EVT) for large vessel occlusion (LVO) remains unclear. We therefore explored the association between prehospital notification and clinical outcomes after EVT. In this single-center retrospective study from 2016 through 2020, we identified all LVO patients who received EVT. Based on the EMS’s usage of a prehospital stroke notification system, we categorized patients into two groups, Hotline and Non-hotline. The primary outcome was good neurological outcome at 90 days; other time metrics were also evaluated. Of all 312 LVO patients, the proportion of good neurological outcomes was 94/218 (43.1%) in the Hotline group and 8/34 (23.5%) in the Non-hotline group (adjusted odds ratio 2.86; 95% confidence interval 1.12 to 7.33). Time from hospital arrival to both tissue plasminogen activator and to groin puncture were shorter in the Hotline group (30 (24 to 38) min vs 48(37 to 65) min, p < 0.001; 40 (32 to 54) min vs 76 (50 to 97) min, p < 0.001), respectively. In conclusion, prehospital notification was associated with a reduction in time from hospital arrival to intervention and improved clinical outcomes in LVO patients treated with EVT.