Scientific Reports (Mar 2021)

The role of the size in thyroid cancer risk stratification

  • Federica Vianello,
  • Simona Censi,
  • Sara Watutantrige-Fernando,
  • Susi Barollo,
  • Yi Hang Zhu,
  • Nora Albiger,
  • Loris Bertazza,
  • Jacopo Manso,
  • Sofia Carducci,
  • Clara Benna,
  • Maurizio Iacobone,
  • Francesca Galuppini,
  • Gianmaria Pennelli,
  • Caterina Mian

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86611-6
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 1
pp. 1 – 10

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Only a minority of cases of differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) have a poor clinical outcome. Clinical outcomes and molecular aspects were assessed in: 144 DTC ≤ 40 mm without distant metastases (group 1); 50 DTC > 40 mm without distant metastases (group 2); and 46 DTC with distant metastases (group 3). Group 3 had a worse outcome than the other two groups: during the follow-up, patients more frequently had persistent disease, died, or underwent further treatment. The outcomes did not differ between groups 1 and 2. Group 3 had a higher prevalence of TERT promoter mutations than group 2 (32.6% vs 14%). Group 1 had a higher frequency of BRAF mutations than groups 2 or 3 (61.1% vs 16.0% and 26.1%, respectively), while RAS mutations were more common in group 2 than in groups 1 and 3 (16.0% vs 2.1% and 6.5%, respectively). Groups 1 and 2 shared the same outcome, but were genetically distinct. Only lymph node involvement, distant metastases, older age and (among the molecular markers) TERT promoter mutations were independent predictors of a worse outcome. Metastatic DTC had the worst outcome, while the outcome was identical for large and small non-metastatic DTC, although they showed different molecular patterns. TERT promoter mutations emerged as an independent factor pointing to a poor prognosis.