Current Oncology (Nov 2023)

Iron Surveillance and Management in Gastro-Intestinal Oncology Patients: A National Physician Survey

  • Emilie S. Richard,
  • Adriyan Hrycyshyn,
  • Noor Salman,
  • Alliya Remtulla Tharani,
  • Alexandria Abbruzzino,
  • Janet Smith,
  • Jacob J. Kachura,
  • Michelle Sholzberg,
  • Jeffrey D. Mosko,
  • Sami A. Chadi,
  • Ronald L. Burkes,
  • Maya Pankiw,
  • Christine Brezden-Masley

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30110714
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 30, no. 11
pp. 9836 – 9848

Abstract

Read online

Purpose: Iron deficiency (ID) is a complication of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers that may manifest as iron deficiency anemia (IDA). Serum ferritin monitoring and oral iron supplementation have the limitations of being falsely elevated and poorly absorbed, respectively. This study aims to assess the discordance in surveillance, treatment practices, and awareness of ID/IDA in GI cancer patients by Canadian physicians treating these patients. Methods: From February 2020 to September 2021, a 22-question electronic survey was sent to medical oncologists (MOs), surgical oncologists (SOs), and gastroenterologists (GEs). The survey collected information about four domains: physician demographics, surveillance practices, treatment practices, and awareness of ID/IDA in GI cancer patients and ASCO/ASH guidelines. Results: A total of 108 (34 MOs, 19 SOs, and 55 GEs) of the 872 (12.4%) invited physicians completed the survey. Of these, 26.5% of MOs, 36.8% of SOs, and 70.9% of GEs measured baseline iron parameters, with few continuing surveillance throughout treatment. Ferritin was widely measured by MOs (88.9%), SOs (100%), and GEs (91.4%). Iron was supplemented if ID/IDA was identified pre-treatment by 66.7% of MOs, 85.7% of SOs, and 94.2% of GEs. Parenteral iron was prescribed by SOs (100%), while oral iron was prescribed by MOs (83.3%) and GEs (87.9%). Only 18.6% of physicians were aware of the ASCO/ASH guidelines regarding erythropoiesis-stimulating agents with parenteral iron for treating chemotherapy-induced anemia. Conclusion: Results illustrate variations in practice patterns for IDA management across the different physician specialties. Moreover, there appeared to be gaps in the knowledge and care surrounding evidence-based IDA management principles which may contribute to poor clinical outcomes.

Keywords