Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care (Jul 2024)

A retrospective study of prostate-specific antigen and international prostate symptoms scores from participants at a men’s health screening initiative in Trinidad

  • Raveed Khan,
  • Ramona St. Hill,
  • Olusegun Awe,
  • O’Reon Bhola,
  • Osayimwense Orumwense,
  • Pavitra Deosaran,
  • Priya Seecharan,
  • Puneeth Avula,
  • Rafiah Mohammed,
  • Ashni Terapalli,
  • Rebecca M. Jardine

DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1895_23
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 8
pp. 3214 – 3219

Abstract

Read online

Background: This study describes the characteristics of men attending a primary health care screening initiative, determines the proportion of men who have elevated International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) scores and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, and determines any correlation between these scores as indicators for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) or prostate cancer. Methods: Data were collected from all patient records during men’s health screening initiatives that occurred in December 2018, January 2019, and March 2019 in Trinidad and Tobago. A total of 350 medical records were analyzed to record patient demographics, PSA levels, and IPSS scores. Analysis of the data was performed with the use of Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software (version 27). Results: Most men who attended the screening initiative belonged to the 61–65 age group (20.57%), with more than half of the men being married (57.71%) and employed (52.57%) and of patients with comorbidities (17%), the most prevalent included hypertension (6%) and diabetes mellitus (3.7%). A mean PSA level of 2.94 ng/ml and a mean IPSS of 7.62 were recorded. Moreover, 11.5% of the males had elevated PSA levels (>4 ng/ml) and 32.9% had elevated IPSS levels (>8). There were correlations between PSA and IPSS values (r = 0.161 and P = 0.006). Age was a predictor of both IPSS and PSA values (r = 0.214, P = 0.000 and r = 0.192, P = 0.000, respectively). Among diabetic participants, a small but significant correlation between IPSS and diabetes was shown (r = 0.223, P = 0.028). As a predictor of elevated IPSS, diabetes had an odds ratio of 1.132 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.021–1.255). Conclusion: Our findings are similar to those described in previous studies; however, further investigations are required to fully describe the relationship between PSA and IPSS. This may assist in advancing screening measures and improving health outcomes for men with BPH and prostate cancer. Primary care physicians should recognize the possible association between BPH and diabetes mellitus and offer appropriate screening where indicated.

Keywords