Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine (Sep 2017)

Korean Shock Society septic shock registry: a preliminary report

  • Tae Gun Shin,
  • Sung Yeon Hwang,
  • Gu Hyun Kang,
  • Won Young Kim,
  • Seung Mok Ryoo,
  • Kyuseok Kim,
  • You Hwan Jo,
  • Sung Phil Chung,
  • Young Seon Joo,
  • Jin Ho Beom,
  • Sung-Hyuk Choi,
  • Young Hoon Yoon,
  • Woon Yong Kwon,
  • Tae Ho Lim,
  • Kap Su Han,
  • Han Sung Choi,
  • Gil Joon Suh

DOI
https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.17.204
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 4, no. 3
pp. 146 – 153

Abstract

Read online

Objective To evaluate the clinical characteristics, therapeutic interventions, and outcomes of patients with septic shock admitted to the emergency department (ED). Methods This study was a preliminary, descriptive analysis of a prospective, multi-center, observational registry of the EDs of 10 hospitals participating in the Korean Shock Society. Patients aged 19 years or older who had a suspected or confirmed infection and evidence of refractory hypotension or hypoperfusion were included. Results A total of 468 patients were enrolled (median age, 71.3 years; male, 55.1%; refractory hypotension, 82.9%; hyperlactatemia without hypotension, 17.1%). Respiratory infection was the most common source of infection (31.0%). The median Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment score was 7.5. The sepsis bundle compliance was 91.2% for lactate measurement, 70.3% for blood culture, 68.4% for antibiotic administration, 80.3% for fluid resuscitation, 97.8% for vasopressor application, 68.0% for central venous pressure measurement, 22.0% for central venous oxygen saturation measurement, and 59.2% for repeated lactate measurement. Among patients who underwent interventions for source control (n=117, 25.1%), 43 (36.8%) received interventions within 12 hours of ED arrival. The in-hospital, 28-day, and 90-day mortality rates were 22.9%, 21.8%, and 27.1%, respectively. The median ED and hospital lengths of stay were 6.8 hours and 12 days, respectively. Conclusion This preliminary report revealed a mortality of over 20% in patients with septic shock, which suggests that there are areas for improvement in terms of the quality of initial resuscitation and outcomes of septic shock patients in the ED.

Keywords