Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine (Sep 2015)

Satisfaction with facial laceration repair by provider specialty in the emergency department

  • Sang-Jae Lee,
  • Young-Duck Cho,
  • Sung-Jun Park,
  • Jung-Youn Kim,
  • Young-Hoon Yoon,
  • Sung-Hyuk Choi

DOI
https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.15.050
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 2, no. 3
pp. 179 – 183

Abstract

Read online

Objective We compared patient satisfaction with scarring after facial laceration repair in the emergency department (ED) based on the specialty of the provider. Methods Patients with facial lacerations admitted to the ED from 2009 to 2013 were divided into two groups. One group of patients underwent repair by an emergency physician (EP) and the other by a plastic surgeon (PS). From August 2014 to September 2014, we randomly selected 10% of all patients and assessed their degree of satisfaction with scarring over the phone using a 5-point Likert scale. Results The male to female ratio was 2.81 in the EP group and 2.05 in PS (P<0.001). The proportion of those aged 0 to 9 years among all the patients was higher in the PS group than in the EP group (50.8% vs. 30.1%, respectively, P<0.001). The duration of ED stay was 107.8±84.6 minutes in the EP group and 225.9 ± 161.8 minutes in the PS group (P<0.001). Among these patients, 228 responded to a telephone survey. A poor satisfaction score of 1 to 2 was more common in female or young patients who underwent repair by an EP (P<0.05). However, the overall satisfaction among all respondents did not differ between the two groups. Conclusion Although female patients and the guardians of young children who underwent simple facial laceration repair by a PS were more satisfied than those treated by an EP, the satisfaction of the entire group of patients did not differ according to the treatment provider.

Keywords