Frontiers in Endocrinology (Jan 2023)

Effect of calcium ionophore (A23187) on embryo development and its safety in PGT cycles

  • Junya Zhang,
  • Junya Zhang,
  • Guidong Yao,
  • Guidong Yao,
  • Tongwei Zhang,
  • Tongwei Zhang,
  • Jingyi Hu,
  • Jingyi Hu,
  • Guang Yang,
  • Guang Yang,
  • Jiahuan He,
  • Jiahuan He,
  • Qina He,
  • Qina He,
  • Huiying Fan,
  • Huiying Fan,
  • Yucheng Bai,
  • Yucheng Bai,
  • Yingpu Sun,
  • Yingpu Sun

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.979248
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundIntracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has tremendous advantages for resolving the problem of male infertility. However, ICSI fertilization can fail in some patients because of various reasons, primarily because of the failure of oocyte activation. Oocytes have been activated using calcium ionophore (A23187) in previous clinical cases of ICSI fertilization failure. However, studies on the efficiency of calcium ionophore (A23187) activation, its effects on the developmental potential of embryos, and its effects on pregnancy outcomes after embryo transfer are relatively limited.MethodsIn this study, we investigated the safety and long-term efficacy of calcium ionophore (A23187) by analyzing its effects on fertilization, embryonic development, aneuploidy, and pregnancy outcomes in patients undergoing preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) cycles.ResultsComparative analyses of the activation followed by PGT (A-PGT) and PGT groups revealed no significant differences between the oocyte cleavage rate and high-quality embryo rate (98.19% vs. 98.63% and 63.13% vs. 68.39%, respectively, p > 0.05). Although the blastocyst formation rate was significantly lower in the A-PGT group than that in the PGT group (52.22% vs. 59.90%, p < 0.05), no significant difference was observed in the blastocyst aneuploidy rates of the two groups (24.49% vs. 24.55%, p > 0.05). Furthermore, no significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of the live birth rate (43.75% vs. 52.99%), week of delivery, and birth weight of the infants after transfer of euploid blastocysts (p > 0.05). Furthermore, the 2PN rate, oocyte cleavage rate, blastocyst formation rate, and live birth rate were found to be significantly lower in the A-ICSI group than those in the ICSI group (p < 0.01), but there was no significant difference between the two groups in the week of delivery and birth weight of live births (p > 0.05).DiscussionThese results suggest that the use of calcium ionophore (A23187) activation as an option in cases of ICSI fertilization failure does not affect the ploidy of developing blastocysts and has no significant effects on the week of delivery or birth weight after transfer. Thus, we provide a scientific basis for the clinical safety of oocyte activation using calcium ionophore (A23187).

Keywords