Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Management of Ureteral Iatrogenic Leakage after Gynecologic Surgery
Federico Fontana,
Filippo Piacentino,
Christian Ossola,
Jvan Casarin,
Andrea Coppola,
Antonella Cromi,
Anna Maria Ierardi,
Gianpaolo Carrafiello,
Antonio Basile,
Federico Deho,
Fabio Ghezzi,
Giulio Carcano,
Massimo Venturini
Affiliations
Federico Fontana
Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, Ospedale Di Circolo, ASST dei Sette Laghi, 21100 Varese, Italy
Filippo Piacentino
Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, Ospedale Di Circolo, ASST dei Sette Laghi, 21100 Varese, Italy
Christian Ossola
School of Medicine and Surgery, Università degli Studi dell’Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy
Jvan Casarin
School of Medicine and Surgery, Università degli Studi dell’Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy
Andrea Coppola
Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, Ospedale Di Circolo, ASST dei Sette Laghi, 21100 Varese, Italy
Antonella Cromi
School of Medicine and Surgery, Università degli Studi dell’Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy
Anna Maria Ierardi
Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy
Gianpaolo Carrafiello
Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy
Antonio Basile
Radiology Unit I, Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies, University Hospital “Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele”, 95123 Catania, Italy
Federico Deho
Urology Department, Ospedale Di Circolo, ASST dei Sette Laghi, 21100 Varese, Italy
Fabio Ghezzi
School of Medicine and Surgery, Università degli Studi dell’Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy
Giulio Carcano
School of Medicine and Surgery, Università degli Studi dell’Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy
Massimo Venturini
Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, Ospedale Di Circolo, ASST dei Sette Laghi, 21100 Varese, Italy
Objective: To report safety and efficacy of interventional radiology procedures in the treatment of gynecologic iatrogenic urinary leaks. Methods: A retrospective analysis of iatrogenic ureteral lesions treated between November 2009 to April 2019 was performed. Under ultrasound (US) and fluoroscopy guidance, an attempt to place a ureteral stent and nephrostomy was carried out in the same session using an anterograde percutaneous approach. At the end of any procedure, a fluoroscopic control and a cone-beam CT scan (CBCT) were performed to check the correct placement and functioning of the nephrostomy and DJ stent. In cases of difficult ureteral stent placement via the single anterograde approach, the collaboration of urologists was requested to perform a rendezvous technique, combined with the retrograde approach. Results: DJ stent placement was achieved using the anterograde approach in 12/15 (80.0%) patients and using the retrograde approach in 3/15 cases (20.0%). Moreover, in 3/15 (20.0%) patients, surgical treatment was needed: in one case because of the persistence of ureteral stenosis at 6 months, and in the other two cases due to ureter-vaginal fistula. No major complications were recorded; overall, minor complications occurred in 4/8 patients. Conclusion: Percutaneous minimally invasive treatment of iatrogenic ureteral lesions after gynecological surgery is a safe and effective option.