Brain Sciences (Apr 2020)

Relation of Intracerebral Hemorrhage Descriptors with Clinical Factors

  • Kornelia M. Kliś,
  • Roger M. Krzyżewski,
  • Borys M. Kwinta,
  • Krzysztof Stachura,
  • Tadeusz J. Popiela,
  • Jerzy Gąsowski,
  • Jacek Długopolski

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10040252
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 4
p. 252

Abstract

Read online

The association between intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) shape and a poor treatment outcome has been established by few authors. We decided to analyze whether computationally assessed hemorrhage shape irregularity is associated with any known predictors of its poor treatment outcome. We retrospectively analyzed 48 patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. For each patient we calculated Fractal Dimension, Compactness, Fourier Factor and Circle Factor. Our study showed that patients above 65 years old had significantly higher Compactness (0.70 ± 0.19 vs. 0.56 ± 0.20; p p = 0.03) and Circle Factor (0.51 ± 0.25 vs. 0.35 ± 0.17; p p p p = 0.03). In conclusion, irregularity resulting from the number of appendices can be a predictor of ICH growth; however, the size of those appendices is also important. Shape roughness better reflects the severity of brain tissue damage and a patient’s general condition.

Keywords