Journal of Clinical Medicine (May 2024)

Enhancing the First-Pass Effect in Acute Stroke: The Impact of Stent Retriever Characteristics

  • Eduardo Murias,
  • Josep Puig,
  • Carmen Serna-Candel,
  • Eva María Gonzalez,
  • Manuel Moreu,
  • Elvira Jiménez-Gómez,
  • Luis SanRoman,
  • Fernando Aparici-Robles,
  • Mikel Terceño,
  • Antonio Mosqueira Martínez,
  • Sonia Aixut,
  • Veredas Romero,
  • Jose Carlos Mendez,
  • Antonio Sagredo-Barra,
  • Yeray Aguilar,
  • Mariano Espinosa de Rueda,
  • Miguel Angel Castaño Blázquez,
  • Saima Bashir,
  • José Rodríguez Castro,
  • Alfonso Lopez-Frías,
  • Jose María Jiménez,
  • Juan Chaviano,
  • Victor Maestro,
  • Javier Manso,
  • Antonio Lopez-Rueda,
  • Sebastià Remollo,
  • Lluis Morales-Caba,
  • Marc Comas-Cufí,
  • Pedro Vega,
  • on behalf of Rossetti Registry Investigators

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13113123
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 11
p. 3123

Abstract

Read online

Introduction: Although stentrievers (SRs) have been a mainstay of mechanical thrombectomy (MT), and current guidelines recommend the use of SRs in the treatment of large vessel occlusion stroke (LVO), there is a paucity of studies in the literature comparing SRs directly against each other in terms of mechanical and functional properties. Timely access to endovascular therapy and the ability to restore intracranial flow in a safe, efficient, and efficacious manner have been critical to the success of MT. This study aimed to investigate the impact of contemporary SR characteristics, including model, brand, size, and length, on the first-pass effect (FPE) in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Methods: Consecutive patients with M1 occlusion treated with a single SR+BGC were recruited from the ROSSETTI registry. The primary outcome was the FPE that was defined as modified (mFPE) or true (tFPE) for the achievement of modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) grades 2b-3 or 3 after a single device pass, respectively. We compared patients who achieved mFPE with those who achieved tFPE according to SR characteristics. Results: We included 610 patients (52.3% female and 47.7% male, mean age 75.1 ± 13.62 years). mFPE was achieved in 357 patients (58.5%), whereas tFPE was achieved in 264 (43.3%). There was no significant association between SR characteristics and mFPE or tFPE. Specifically, the SR size did not show a statistically significant relationship with improvement in FPE. Similarly, the length of the SR did not yield significant differences in the mFPE and tFPE, even when the data were grouped. Conclusions: Our data indicate that contemporary SR-mediated thrombectomy characteristics, including model, brand, size, and length, do not significantly affect the FPE.

Keywords