Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics (Jan 2023)

Posterior stability of the shoulder depends on acromial anatomy: a biomechanical study of 3D surface models

  • Bettina Hochreiter,
  • Silvan Beeler,
  • Simon Hofstede,
  • Bastian Sigrist,
  • Jess G. Snedeker,
  • Christian Gerber

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-023-00623-x
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 1
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Purpose Primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis is commonly associated with static posterior subluxation of the humeral head. Scapulae with static/dynamic posterior instability feature a superiorly and horizontally oriented acromion. We investigated whether the acromion acts as a restraint to posterior humeral translation. Methods Five three‐dimensional (3D) printed scapula models were biomechanically tested. A statistical shape mean model (SSMM) of the normal scapula of 40 asymptomatic shoulders was fabricated. Next, a SSMM of scapular anatomy associated with posterior subluxation was generated using data of 20 scapulae (“B1”). This model was then used to generate three models of surgical correction: glenoid version, acromial orientation, and acromial and glenoid orientation. With the joint axially loaded (100N) and the humerus stabilized, an anterior translation force was applied to the scapula in 35°, 60° and 75° of glenohumeral flexion. Translation (mm) was measured. Results In the normal scapula, the humerus translates significantly less to contact with the acromion compared to all other configurations (p < .000 for all comparisons; i.e. 35°: “normal” 8,1 mm (± 0,0) versus “B1” 11,9 mm (± 0,0) versus “B1 Acromion Correction” 12,2 mm (± 0,2) versus “B1 Glenoid Correction” 13,3 mm (± 0,1)). Restoration of normal translation was only achieved with correction of glenoid and acromial anatomy (i.e. 75°: “normal” 11 mm (± 0,8) versus “B1 Acromion Correction” 17,5 mm (± 0,1) versus “B1 Glenoid Correction” 19,7 mm (± 1,3) versus “B1 Glenoid + Acromion Correction” 11,5 mm (± 1,1)). Conclusions Persistence or recurrence of static/dynamic posterior instability after correction of glenoid version alone may be related to incomplete restoration of the intrinsic stability that is conferred by a normal acromial anatomy. Level of Evidence V biomechanical study

Keywords