Linguistica (Dec 2016)

On the (in)definiteness of impersonal pronouns

  • Sarah Zobel

DOI
https://doi.org/10.4312/linguistica.56.1.363-374
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 56, no. 1

Abstract

Read online

This paper addresses the question whether impersonal pronouns should be analyzed as indefinite or definite expressions based on their discourse anaphoric potential. I present new data that support the claim that impersonal pronouns should be analyzed as neither (see Koenig & Mauner 1999). I sketch a formal analysis that captures this behaviour. Furthermore, I show that the availability of quantificational variability effects for impersonal pronouns is not foolproof evidence for their indefiniteness as is usually assumed in the literature (see Malamud 2013).

Keywords